We’re not anti-intellectual here, but sometimes we wonder why the world’s cleverest people don’t just ask the rest
of us before they start their research projects: we could save them a lot of time.

“When stacking apples on a market stall, fruit sellers naturally adopt a particular arrangement: a regular pyramid with a triangular base. The Laboratoire de Physique des Solides has demonstrated that this arrangement is favoured for reasons of mechanical stability,” Science Daily tells us.

Next month: zoologists finally discover why that bear is going into the woods.

We’re always delighted to bring you the things that sources say. It’s one more way we avoid writing proper stories. Ben Whishaw will be head techie Q, the man who says, “Try not to break it, 007,” when he hands Bond the coffee flask with the invisible laser wombat gun, in the next James Bond film!

The “source” said: “Female fans will have more than Daniel to gush over now Ben’s been cast as Q. He’ll be a big draw… His role will be very different from previous Qs. He’ll be far more serious.”

Anyone who thinks that James Bond films are stuck in the past might note that “serious” is, as usual, “making females gush”.
 

And so to University College London (UCL), where researchers in the department of the Bleedin’ Obvious have discovered that the more Facebook friends you have, the more friends you have, which also correlates to the size of certain regions of the brain: presumably including the one that controls typing OMG!!!, or the one that helps you to post movies of cats falling over.

They stress that this is a correlation and not a cause: so if you recruit thousands of Facebook friends, this does not mean you’re going to get a single extra friend in real life. Or, we guess, that bits of your brain will not suddenly start to swell to gigantic proportions, so it's not all bad news.

In useful research this week, Northwestern University has developed a nanomaterial that can “steer” electric currents.

“The development could lead to a computer that can simply reconfigure its internal wiring,” it reports. The paper in Nature Nanotechnology concentrates on things like a nano­computer, which can adapt its own circuitry to reconfigure itself.

It doesn’t go into more important problems facing technologists: who’s going to take care of the patching this Tuesday? Can I pull this cable out to see if it does anything? Jobs that computers could sort for themselves, if only one of them would put its little nanohand up and volunteer. But no.

At the other end of the innovation scale, Joel Primack, distinguished professor of physics at the University of California, Santa Cruz, and Anatoly Klypin, professor of astronomy at New Mexico State University, have created the Bolshoi supercomputer simulation of the universe, and it’s
apparently the most sophisticated representation of the universe so far. Except for the real one, that is.

It’s about one billion light years across – or it would be if it weren’t inside a computer. The good news is that it works just like the real universe (it just uses much less electricity) and therefore will be really useful if we continue to make a mess of this one and need somewhere else to go in
a hurry.